Current:Home > ScamsEthermac|Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal -RiskWatch
Ethermac|Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
SignalHub Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-08 15:38:04
MADISON,Ethermac Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine’s use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities refuted those claims and defended the legality of the van, saying there was no specific prohibition against it.
The lawsuit over the mobile voting van is one of several in battleground Wisconsin that could affect voting rules in the upcoming presidential election.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, Racine City Clerk Tara McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled across the city to meet voters in their neighborhoods and collect early ballots.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. They argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the November election that year, saying that there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. That led the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to then file its lawsuit.
Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, in a ruling late Monday, overturned the elections commission’s dismissal of the complaint, saying state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
“Nowhere can this Court find or has been provided any authority allowing the use of a van or vehicle as an alternate absentee voting vehicle,” the judge wrote.
He rejected the argument from defendants that the use of mobile voting sites was allowable because there is no specific prohibition against them.
The judge said his ruling wasn’t a determination on whether mobile voting sites were a good idea or not. That is up to the Legislature to decide, Gasiorkiewicz said.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state Department of Justice, which represented it in the lawsuit, did not return messages seeking comment on whether the decision will be appealed. McMenamin was in a meeting Tuesday and did not return a message seeking comment.
Early in-person absentee voting in Wisconsin for the municipal spring election begins Feb. 6. The presidential primary is April 2, with absentee voting allowed two weeks before it.
If appealed, the case could ultimately be decided by Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.
Lucas Vebber, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, hailed the ruling.
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another,” Vebber said. “This decision does just that.”
veryGood! (24565)
Related
- Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
- Taliban kills ISIS-K leader behind 2021 Afghanistan airport attack that left 13 Americans dead, U.S. officials say
- The Biden administration is capping the cost of internet for low-income Americans
- TikTok Star Avani Gregg Dishes on if Those Good American Jeans Really Stretch 4 Sizes
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Fidelity will start offering bitcoin as an investment option in 401(k) accounts
- Zendaya’s Stylist Law Roach Addresses Claim He’s “Breaking Up” With Her
- Here's Why Red Lipstick Makes You Think of Sex
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Instagram and Facebook begin removing posts offering abortion pills
Ranking
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- U.S. accuses notorious Mexican cartel of targeting Americans in timeshare fraud
- Hal Walker: The Man Who Shot The Moon
- Proof Zendaya Is Already Close With Tom Holland's Family
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- Iran airs video of commandos descending from helicopter to seize oil tanker bound for Texas
- What does a black hole sound like? NASA has an answer
- Shop the Best Spring Wedding Guest Dresses for Under $50
Recommendation
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Group aiming to defund disinformation tries to drain Fox News of online advertising
Ulta 24-Hour Flash Sale: Take 50% Off Dermalogica, Clarins, Lancôme, and Ofra Cosmetics
Russia plans to limit Instagram and could label Meta an extremist group
EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
Swedish research rocket flies off course, accidentally lands in Norway
What Caelynn Miller-Keyes Really Thinks of Dean Unglert's Vasectomy Offer
Elon Musk says doubt about spam accounts could doom Twitter deal