Current:Home > InvestJohnathan Walker:Republican challenge to New York’s mail voting expansion reaches state’s highest court -RiskWatch
Johnathan Walker:Republican challenge to New York’s mail voting expansion reaches state’s highest court
FinLogic FinLogic Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-07 14:04:21
ALBANY,Johnathan Walker N.Y. (AP) — New York’s highest court heard arguments Tuesday in a Republican challenge of a law that allows any registered voter to cast a mail-in ballot during the early voting period.
The case, which is led by Rep. Elise Stefanik and includes other lawmakers and the Republican National Committee, is part of a widespread GOP effort to tighten voting rules after the 2020 election.
Democrats approved the mail voting expansion law last year. The Republican challenge argues that it violates voting provisions in the state Constitution.
The hourlong arguments before the New York Court of Appeals in Albany hinged on technical readings of the Constitution, specifically whether certain passages would allow for the state Legislature to expand mail voting access.
At certain points in the hearing, judges quizzed attorneys on whether a constitutional provision that says eligible voters are entitled to vote “at every election” would mean a physical polling place or simply the election in general.
Michael Y. Hawrylchak, an attorney representing the Republicans, said that provision “presupposes a physical place” for in-person voting. Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey W. Lang, who is representing the state, said the phrase “just refers to a process of selecting an office holder” and not any physical polling place.
Democrats first tried to expand mail voting through a constitutional amendment in 2021, but voters rejected the proposal after a campaign from conservatives who said it would lead to voter fraud.
Lower courts have dismissed the Republican lawsuit in decisions that said the Legislature has the constitutional authority to make rules on voting and the Constitution doesn’t require voting specifically to occur in person on election day.
It is unclear when the Court of Appeals will rule.
veryGood! (48195)
Related
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Endangered baby pygmy hippo finds new home at Pittsburgh Zoo
- WWE Wrestling Champ Sara Lee's Cause of Death Revealed
- Lionel Messi picks Major League Soccer's Inter Miami
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Vanderpump Rules’ Tom Sandoval Reveals He’s One Month Sober
- Pigeon Power: The Future of Air Pollution Monitoring in a Tiny Backpack?
- It cost $38,398 for a single shot of a very old cancer drug
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Today’s Climate: July 27, 2010
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- It's getting easier to find baby formula. But you might still run into bare shelves
- How some doctors discriminate against patients with disabilities
- The Mystery of the Global Methane Rise: Asian Agriculture or U.S. Fracking?
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Vanderpump Rules’ Tom Sandoval Reveals He’s One Month Sober
- This Is Prince Louis' World and the Royals Are Just Living In It
- How Big Oil Blocked the Nation’s Greenest Governor on Climate Change
Recommendation
Bill Belichick's salary at North Carolina: School releases football coach's contract details
How Fatherhood Changed Everything for George Clooney
This Nigerian city has a high birth rate of twins — and no one is sure why
Bachelor Nation's Brandon Jones and Serene Russell Break Up
NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
Here Are All of the Shows That Have Been Impacted By the WGA Strike 2023
Dianna Agron Addresses Rumor She Was Barred From Cory Monteith's Glee Tribute Episode
Today’s Climate: July 20, 2010