Current:Home > reviewsCourt battle begins over Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming health care for minors -RiskWatch
Court battle begins over Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming health care for minors
View
Date:2025-04-18 03:06:35
SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (AP) — Missouri’s Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey and the families of transgender children are in court this week fighting over whether a new law banning minors from receiving gender-affirming health care will take effect as scheduled Monday.
Lawyers last month sued to overturn the law on behalf of three families of transgender minors, doctors and two LGBTQ+ organizations. They asked a county judge to temporarily block the law as the court challenge against it plays out.
Hearings over pausing the law are taking place this week in Springfield. A judge is expected to rule before Monday.
THE LAW
The law, signed by Republican Gov. Mike Parson in June, would prohibit Missouri health care providers from providing puberty blockers, hormones and gender-affirming surgeries to minors. Minors prescribed puberty blockers or hormones before Aug. 28 would be able to continue to receive those treatments.
Missouri’s Planned Parenthood clinics had been ramping up available appointments and holding pop-up clinics to start patients on treatments before the law takes effect.
Most adults would still have access to transgender health care under the law, but Medicaid wouldn’t cover it and prisoners’ access to surgeries would be limited.
Physicians who violate the law face having their licenses revoked and being sued by patients. The law makes it easier for former patients to sue, giving them 15 years to go to court and promising at least $500,000 in damages if they succeed.
The law expires in August 2027.
LEGAL ARGUMENTS
Lawyers for the plaintiffs’ wrote in a court filing that the law unlawfully discriminates against transgender patients “by denying them medically necessary care and insurance coverage because of their sex and because of their transgender status.”
In court briefs, the Attorney General’s Office argued that the law is not discriminatory because it “applies evenly to boys and girls.”
“The only distinction made is based on the condition to be treated,” lawyers for the office wrote. “Puberty blockers, testosterone, and estrogen can all still be used to treat various conditions (such as precocious puberty). They just cannot be used as an experimental response to gender dysphoria.”
WHAT HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS SAY
The Food and Drug Administration approved puberty blockers 30 years ago to treat children with precocious puberty — a condition that causes sexual development to begin much earlier than usual. Sex hormones — synthetic forms of estrogen and testosterone — were approved decades ago to treat hormone disorders or as birth control pills.
The FDA has not approved the medications specifically to treat gender-questioning youth, but they have been used for many years for that purpose “off label,” a common and accepted practice for many medical conditions. Doctors who treat trans patients say those decades of use are proof that the treatments are not experimental.
Every major medical organization, including the American Medical Association, has opposed the bans on gender-affirming care for minors and supported the medical care for youth when administered appropriately. Lawsuits have been filed in several states where bans have been enacted this year.
veryGood! (7598)
Related
- Elon Musk's skyrocketing net worth: He's the first person with over $400 billion
- We knew what was coming from Mahomes, Chiefs. How did San Francisco 49ers not?
- A shooter opened fire in a Houston church. Gunfire has also scarred other Texas places of worship
- Real rock stars at the World of Concrete
- Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
- Super PAC supporting RFK Jr. airs $7 million ad during Super Bowl
- Two fired FirstEnergy executives indicted in $60 million Ohio bribery scheme, fail to surrender
- Smoking in cars with kids is banned in 11 states, and West Virginia could be next
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- Chiefs players – and Taylor Swift – take their Super Bowl party to the Las Vegas Strip
Ranking
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Beyoncé's new country singles break the internet and highlight genre's Black roots
- Was this Chiefs' worst Super Bowl title team? Where 2023 squad ranks in franchise history
- AP PHOTOS: New Orleans, Rio, Cologne -- Carnival joy peaks around the world as Lent approaches
- Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
- Popular online retailer Temu facing a class-action lawsuit in Illinois over data privacy concerns
- Bob's Red Mill founder, Bob Moore, dies at 94
- Iceland's volcano eruption cuts off hot water supply to thousands after shooting lava 260 feet in the air
Recommendation
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
Dora the Explorer Was Shockingly the Harshest Critic of the 2024 Super Bowl
Judge orders Elon Musk to testify in SEC probe of his $44 billion Twitter takeover in 2022
Flight attendants don't earn their hourly pay until aircraft doors close. Here's why
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Republican Michigan lawmaker loses staff and committee assignment after online racist post
What is breadcrumbing? Paperclipping? Beware of these toxic viral dating trends.
Mega Millions winning numbers for February 9 as jackpot climbs to $394 million