Current:Home > MySupreme Court backs Biden on CFPB funding suit, avoiding warnings of housing 'chaos' -RiskWatch
Supreme Court backs Biden on CFPB funding suit, avoiding warnings of housing 'chaos'
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:17:35
WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Thursday batted away a challenge to how the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is funded, keeping the Obama-era agency in place and sustaining a regulation from 2017 that cracked down on payday lenders.
Instead of subjecting the bureau to annual budget fights on Capitol Hill like most of the government, the CFPB is funded through the Federal Reserve − an effort to shield it from political pressure. Critics said the arrangement violated the Constitution and the principle that Congress alone wields the power of the purse.
The 7-2 decision was a victory for the Biden administration which had asked the court to overturn a conservative appeals court decision invalidating the funding mechanism.
Writing for the majority, Justice Clarence Thomas said funding doesn’t have to come through the congressional appropriation process. An appropriation, he wrote, “is simply a law that authorizes expenditures from a specified source of public money for designated purposes.”
“The statute that provides the Bureau’s funding meets these requirements,” he wrote.
Prep for the polls: See who is running for president and compare where they stand on key issues in our Voter Guide
More:MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell, a Trump ally, has his phone seizure case rejected by Supreme Court
In a dissent joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, Justice Samuel Alito said the majority’s interpretation allows for laws that would let an agency “draw as much money as it wants from any identified source for any permissible purpose until the end of time.”
"It's not an exaggeration to say that the CFPB's enjoys a degree of financial autonomy that a Stuart king would envy," Alito wrote.
Biden: `win for American consumers'
President Joe Biden called the decision an “unmistakable win for American consumers” in protecting a bureau that he said has saved billions for Americans on credit card late fees, overdraft charges and other “junk fees.”
“In the face of years of attacks from extreme Republicans and special interests, the Court made clear that the CFPB’s funding authority is constitutional and that its strong record of consumer protection will not be undone,” Biden said in a statement.
While the case involved a technical matter about the agency’s funding, the implications were potentially vast. A ruling against the agency could have called into question virtually every regulation it has approved affecting auto loans, mortgages and even credit cards. The Mortgage Bankers Association warned that a broad ruling from the high court could have sent the housing market "into chaos, to the detriment of all mortgage borrowers."
The justices appeared to be sensitive to those concerns during oral arguments in October. Even some of the court’s most stalwart conservatives, who have sought to limit the power of federal agencies in other cases, appeared skeptical of the industry’s challenge.
CFPB enforces lending rules
Congress created the bureau in 2010 in part to enforce lending regulations. The agency is funded by the Federal Reserve, which gets its money from banking fees and other sources.
At the center of the case was a payday lending rule the bureau issued in 2017. The rule bars lenders from withdrawing payments from borrowers' bank accounts after two failed attempts. The extra withdrawal attempts, the agency said, would likely not help lenders recoup any money but instead saddle borrowers with overdraft fees. Payday lending groups sued over the agency's funding method.
Before the case reached the Supreme Court, a three-judge panel of the Louisiana-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit ruled that the agency acted within its power to create the regulation. But the appeals court ruled that the way Congress set up the agency’s funding violated the constitutional principle that only Congress has the power to initiate spending.
The Center for Responsible Lending said the Supreme Court's reversal of the appeals court's decision will enable the federal watchdog agency to continue protecting “American’s wallets from predatory financial firms.”
“The Supreme Court’s ruling provided a welcome dose of common sense as it rejected an unprecedented, reckless argument that could have destabilized a housing market that undergirds our economy and invited challenges to funding for most of the federal government, including Medicare and the Federal Reserve,” said Nadine Chabrier, senior policy and litigation counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending.
The case, which was argued in October on the first day of the current term, is Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America.
veryGood! (684)
Related
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- More Than a Decade of Megadrought Brought a Summer of Megafires to Chile
- Prigozhin's rebellion undermined Putin's standing among Russian elite, officials say
- Keep Up With Khloé Kardashian’s Style and Save 60% On Good American Jeans, Bodysuits, and More
- 'Malcolm in the Middle’ to return with new episodes featuring Frankie Muniz
- The Summer I Turned Pretty Season 2 Gift Guide: American Eagle, Local Eclectic, Sperry & More
- Botched's Dr. Terry Dubrow Issues Warning on Weight Loss Surgeries After Lisa Marie Presley Death
- Matthew Lawrence Teases His Happily Ever After With TLC's Chilli
- Federal Spending Freeze Could Have Widespread Impact on Environment, Emergency Management
- Climate Change Wiped Out Thousands of the West’s Most Iconic Cactus. Can Planting More Help a Species that Takes a Century to Mature?
Ranking
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Barbenheimer opening weekend raked in $235.5 million together — but Barbie box office numbers beat Oppenheimer
- John Akomfrah’s ‘Purple’ Is Climate Change Art That Asks Audiences to Feel
- Josh Hartnett and Wife Tamsin Egerton Step Out for First Red Carpet Date Night in Over a Year
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Summer of '69: When Charles Manson Scared the Hell Out of Hollywood
- Promising to Prevent Floods at Treasure Island, Builders Downplay Risk of Sea Rise
- Awash in Toxic Wastewater From Fracking for Natural Gas, Pennsylvania Faces a Disposal Reckoning
Recommendation
Selena Gomez's "Weird Uncles" Steve Martin and Martin Short React to Her Engagement
New IPCC Report Shows the ‘Climate Time Bomb Is Ticking,’ Says UN Secretary General António Guterres
Washington’s Treasured Cherry Blossoms Prompt Reflection on Local Climate Change
Activists Make Final Appeal to Biden to Block Arctic Oil Project
IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
California Enters ‘Uncharted Territory’ After Cutting Payments to Rooftop Solar Owners by 75 Percent
Kylie Jenner Debuts New Photos of “Big Boy” Aire Webster That Will Have You on Cloud 9
New IPCC Report Shows the ‘Climate Time Bomb Is Ticking,’ Says UN Secretary General António Guterres