Current:Home > MyProsecutors urge judge not to toss out Trump’s hush money conviction, pushing back on immunity claim -RiskWatch
Prosecutors urge judge not to toss out Trump’s hush money conviction, pushing back on immunity claim
View
Date:2025-04-14 12:22:40
NEW YORK (AP) — Prosecutors are urging a judge to uphold Donald Trump’s historic hush money conviction, arguing in court papers made public Thursday that the verdict should stand despite the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on presidential immunity.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office said in a court filing that the high court’s opinion “has no bearing” on the hush money case because it involves unofficial acts for which a former president is not immune.
“There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s verdict,” prosecutors wrote in a 66-page filing.
Lawyers for the Republican presidential nominee are trying to get the verdict — and even the indictment — tossed out because of the Supreme Court’s decision July 1. The ruling insulates former presidents from being criminally prosecuted for official acts and bars prosecutors from pointing to official acts as evidence that a commander in chief’s unofficial actions were illegal.
That decision came about a month after a Manhattan jury found Trump guilty of falsifying business records to conceal a deal to pay off porn actor Stormy Daniels shortly before the 2016 election. At the time, she was considering going public with a story of a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump, who says no such thing happened. He has denied any wrongdoing.
Trump was a private citizen when his then-lawyer, Michael Cohen, paid Daniels. But Trump was president when Cohen was reimbursed. Prosecutors say those repayments were misleadingly logged simply as legal expenses in Trump’s company records. Cohen testified that he and Trump discussed the repayment arrangement in the Oval Office.
Trump’s lawyers have argued that prosecutors rushed to trial instead of waiting for the Supreme Court’s view on presidential immunity, and that the trial was “tainted” by evidence that should not have been allowed under the high court’s ruling.
Judge Juan M. Merchan plans to rule Sept. 6 on the Trump lawyers’ request. The judge has set Trump’s sentencing for Sept. 18, “if such is still necessary” after he reaches his conclusions about immunity.
The sentencing, which carries the potential for anything from probation to up to four years in prison, initially was set for mid-July. But within hours of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Trump’s team asked to delay the sentencing. Merchan soon pushed the sentencing back to consider their immunity arguments.
Under the Supreme Court’s decision, lower courts are largely the ones that will have to figure out what constitutes an official act.
Indeed, even the conservative justices responsible for the majority opinion differed about what is proper for jurors to hear about a president’s conduct.
In a separate concurring opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the Constitution does not require juries to be blinded “to the circumstances surrounding conduct for which presidents can be held liable” and suggested that it would needlessly “hamstring” a prosecutor’s case to prohibit any mention of an official act in question.
Before the Supreme Court ruling, Trump’s lawyers brought up presidential immunity in a failed bid last year to get the hush money case moved from state court to federal court.
Later, they tried to hold off the hush money trial until the Supreme Court ruled on his immunity claim, which arose from a separate prosecution — the Washington-based federal criminal case surrounding Trump’s efforts to overturn his 2020 presidential election loss.
Trump’s lawyers never raised presidential immunity as a defense in the hush money trial, but they tried unsuccessfully to prevent prosecutors from showing the jury evidence from his time in office.
veryGood! (93518)
Related
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Record Store Day celebrates indie retail music sellers as they ride vinyl’s popularity wave
- A conspiracy theorist set himself on fire outside of Donald Trump's hush money trial: cops
- Idaho group says it is exploring a ballot initiative for abortion rights and reproductive care
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- A cop ran a light going 88 mph and killed a young father of twins. He still has his badge
- Save an Extra 25% on Abercrombie & Fitch’s Chic & Stylish Activewear, with Tees & Tanks as Low as $25
- Boston Dynamics' robot Atlas being billed as 'fully-electric humanoid': Watch it in action
- Taylor Swift makes surprise visit to Kansas City children’s hospital
- 2 teens charged in death of New York City woman whose body was found in duffel bag
Ranking
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- Online gambling casts deepening shadow on pro sports
- Don't Sleep on These While You Were Sleeping Secrets
- South Africa man convicted in deaths of 2 Alaska Native women faces revocation of U.S. citizenship
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- Q&A: How The Federal Biden Administration Plans to Roll Out $20 Billion in Financing for Clean Energy Development
- Psst! Coach Outlet Has So Many Cute Bags on Sale Right Now, and They’re All Under $100
- Sen. Bob Menendez's trial delayed. Here's when it will begin.
Recommendation
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Cavaliers grind out victory over Magic in Game 1 of NBA playoff series
8 shot including 2 men killed at a party with hundreds attending in Memphis park, police say
Who dies in 'Rebel Moon 2: The Scargiver'? We tally the dead and the reborn. (Spoilers!)
Civic engagement nonprofits say democracy needs support in between big elections. Do funders agree?
Who will win the Stanley Cup? Predictions for NHL playoffs bracket
3 hospitalized after knife attack on boat in New York City, along East River in Brooklyn
NHL power rankings entering playoffs: Who has best chance at winning Stanley Cup?